On 10.08.2015 14:58, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:34:20PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> V1 introduced quite a big refactor, so to be able to better keep track
> of changes performed from v1 to v2, only this v2 diff patch is presented
> and eventually will be squashed to the previous series with a different
> commit message.
> ---
>
> You can still checkout the forked repo
>
https://github.com/eskultety/libvirt/tree/virt-shell
>
> cfg.mk | 2 +-
> tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c | 3 +-
> tools/virsh-domain.c | 668
> ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> tools/virsh-domain.h | 3 +-
> tools/virsh-edit.c | 8 +-
> tools/virsh-interface.c | 42 +--
> tools/virsh-interface.h | 2 +-
> tools/virsh-network.c | 76 ++---
> tools/virsh-network.h | 2 +-
> tools/virsh-nodedev.c | 38 +--
> tools/virsh-nwfilter.c | 34 +--
> tools/virsh-nwfilter.h | 2 +-
> tools/virsh-pool.c | 66 ++---
> tools/virsh-pool.h | 2 +-
> tools/virsh-secret.c | 28 +-
> tools/virsh-snapshot.c | 94 +++---
> tools/virsh-volume.c | 52 ++--
> tools/virsh-volume.h | 2 +-
> tools/virsh.c | 339 +---------------------
> tools/virsh.h | 25 +-
> tools/vsh.c | 559 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> tools/vsh.h | 32 ++-
> 22 files changed, 1062 insertions(+), 1017 deletions(-)
>
I seriously hope we're not getting any other issues because of
this
patch(set) because finding a problem in it in the future terrible, but
splitting it now into multiple patches doesn't seem worth it to me.
I would like another opinion, though. My opinion is that we should
fix this one last thing I mentioned above and squash it in a patch we
push this week since it's still early after a release.
Agreed. The sooner we push this the better.
Michal