Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/12/2010 07:23 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
[trying to clear out some old mail]
>> >From bc3404d9f12c42cf883a43395fee6fc14c952b2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 15:43:32 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] lxcSetSchedulerParameters: reverse order of tests; diagnose a
failure
>>
>> * src/lxc/lxc_driver.c (lxcSetSchedulerParameters): Ensure that
>> "->field" is "cpu_shares" before possibly giving a
diagnostic about
>> a type for a "cpu_shares" value.
>> Also, virCgroupSetCpuShares could fail without evoking a diagnostic.
>> Add one.
>> lxcError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, "%s",
>> - _("Invalid type for cpu_shares tunable, expected a
'ullong'"));
>> + _("Invalid type for cpu_shares tunable, expected a
'ullong'"));
>
> Why the indentation change here?
To answer my own question - to fit in 80 columns.
>
> ACK.
I applied this one on Jim's behalf, after validating that everything
still builds fine after rebasing on current sources.
Thanks! It'd fallen off my radar.