On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:56 AM Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:58:01AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 04:20:24AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
systemd is in a similar position as us, where they can't really break compatibility because too much stuff is built on top, so they just use an ever-increasing version number. Simple and effective. Why can't we do the same?
Note systemd is not strictly single digit - their stable releases have an extra digit.
And we could do the same.
I will also point out that systemd switched to an integer specifically so they could break everything all the time. The libsystemd library is not intended to be considered stable. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!