On 09/27/2011 01:20 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
@@ -10477,13 +10477,16 @@ virDomainDefFormatInternal(virDomainDefPtr def, if (def->id == -1) flags |= VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE;
- virBufferAsprintf(buf, "<domain type='%s'", type); + virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%*s<domain type='%s'", indent, "", type);
Hum I have never seen that formatting command used before. I would rather add a virBufferIndentAsprintf() instead to be honnest and avoid this, that's clearer from my POV.
I had to add virBufferIndentEscapeString, since that could only take one %s in the format, but left virBufferAsprintf up to the user to exploit full formatting power. But now that you mention it, yes, virBufferIndentAsprintf would make things easier to read. I'll incorporate that into my v2.
That looks correct, I think pushing this would be fine but a separate patch implementing and using virBufferIndentAsprintf() would be a nice improvement,
Rather, I'll wait to push until I have a v2; Dan's suggestion for folding more indent smarts into virBuffer will also impact me. -- Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org