On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 14:17:04 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>
> Update the remote driver to use the virNetClient close callback
> to trigger the virConnectPtr close callbacks
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/remote/remote_driver.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/remote/remote_driver.c b/src/remote/remote_driver.c
> index a69e69a..d41be55 100644
> --- a/src/remote/remote_driver.c
> +++ b/src/remote/remote_driver.c
> @@ -320,6 +320,19 @@ enum virDrvOpenRemoteFlags {
> };
>
>
> +static void remoteClientCloseFunc(virNetClientPtr client ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> + int reason,
> + void *opaque)
> +{
> + virConnectPtr conn = opaque;
> +
> + if (conn->closeCallback) {
> + VIR_DEBUG("Triggering connection close callback %p reason=%d",
> + conn->closeCallback, reason);
> + conn->closeCallback(conn, reason, conn->closeOpaque);
> + }
> +}
> +
Hmm, should we lock conn first to avoid possible race condition with
virConnectUnregisterCloseCallback()?
Yes, that's a good point.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|