On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:14:33 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 06:12:33AM -0400, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:36:56AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > The sources for new libvirt-ocaml releases are hosted via gitlab. Add
> > the link. Since old releases are not present there preserve also the old
> > link.
> ...
> > * - OCaml
> > - - `libvirt <
https://download.libvirt.org/ocaml/>`__
> > + - `gitlab <
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-ocaml/-/tags>`__
> > + `libvirt (old versions) <
https://download.libvirt.org/ocaml/>`__
>
> Is the fact that no tarballs have been uploaded for the last few
> releases intentional, or an oversight?
>
> While I see tags for those releases in GitLab, in general git tags
> are not a replacement for proper release tarballs, which I'm not
> seeing anywhere on GitLab.
Indeed, as was seen recently with github, the auto-generated tarballs
can change when the backend impl changes, which invalidate any hashes
vendors are using to validate tarballs. It is unwise to rely on the
auto-generated tarballs as the canonical release artifacts
>
> The Fedora package still points to the
libvirt.org server too[1], so
> to me it appears that a few uploads were simply missed.
>
> Rich?