On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:54:25PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:53:29PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:10:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the documentation is wrong - all inactive VMs have an ID
> > of -1, and thus lookup-by-ID is nonsensical for inactive VMs.
> >
> > If any application did make use of this change which falls back to
> > lookup-by-name, then it would only ever work with OpenVZ and not
> > any of the other libvirt drivers, which isn't useful behaviour.
> [...]
> > > Then the virLookupById description must be updated, I'm not against
it,
> > > but we need to be coherent.
> >
> > Indeed, the docs need to be clarified.
>
> okay, what about
> * Try to find a domain based on the hypervisor ID number
> * Note that this won't work for inactive domains which have an ID of -1,
> * in that case a lookup based on the Name or UUId need to be done instead.
>
> and then revert that specific part of the patch, as attached. Also
> I would make a 'make rebuild' in the doc directory and push the doc update
Yep, that gets my vote
okay, done :-)
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/