Re: [libvirt] Remaining interface state reporting issue - bond options

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:44:26AM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > I haven't been able to find a source of this information yet and, while > it may be useful, I don't see it as necessary. Once again I'm proposing > that we make these optional in the XML, such that this would be acceptable: > > <interface type="bond" name="bond0"> > <bond> > <interface type="ethernet" name="eth1"/> > <interface type="ethernet" name="eth0"/> > </bond> > </interface> > > Once we do that, the netcf-reported state of all 4 supported interface > types (ethernet, bridge, vlan, bond) will pass libvirt's parsing test. > That sounds OK to me - the miimon vs arpmode stuff is not critical. The interface topology is the only really important thing& you've got that working now.