On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:29:34PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 12/12/2013 04:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
+++ b/autobuild.sh @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ python setup.py build python setup.py test python setup.py install --root="$AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT"
I haven't tested it, but shouldn't these lines ^^, and others similar to them, be changed to "python2" in case my default python version is 3? And if those "python2" are checked as well, it would be usable even without python2.
Yes, we should use python2
But does 'python2' exist in PATH on RHEL5? You have to be careful that whatever solution you have works on systems with only one python installed (whether that be old systems with python 2, or bleeding edge systems with _only_ python 3).
Yes, I checked RHEL5 for this. It has python2 in /usr/bin Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|