On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:52:08PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/22/2017 11:52 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> One of the conditions in qemuDomainDeviceCalculatePCIConnectFlags
> was missing a break that could result it in falling through to
> an incorrect codepath.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
> index 5b75044..27ca010 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
> @@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ qemuDomainDeviceCalculatePCIConnectFlags(virDomainDeviceDefPtr
dev,
> return pciFlags;
> }
> }
> + break;
Indentation looks weird. I guess its because we have an extra {} scope
for allowing declaration of variables? Would hoisting the declaration
(not initialization) of
case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CONTROLLER: {
virDomainControllerDefPtr cont = dev->data.controller;
allow us to get rid of the weird {}?
Yes, though this style is not that unusual - we've got it in a number
of other places in libvirt already where we want to isolate the
variable declaration, so I think this is ok as is.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|