On 21.04.2016 13:15, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:24:11AM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy
wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Consider next usecase. There are active domain DA on host A and active domain
> DB on host B and the uuids of domains are the same. This is quite uncommon of
> course but still possible. If we have option to change uuid on migration
> then migration of DA to host B is possible and if we don't have the option
> we have to stop/edit/start DA to migrate.
>
> What is you opinion on subject? Can this functionality be taken into upstream
> and in what form? In form of setting uuid as a migration parameter or option to
> regenerate uuid on destination?
>
I don't have a particular opinion on this. I think other generated
stuff could break, e.g. those domains could have the same MAC address
etc. I know it's not someone cares about in this case, but there are
few things to keep in mind. We were discussing something similar in
other threads here about multiplying domains. I wonder, though, if you
can change the name (using 'dname' for virsh), why wouldn't you be able
to change the uuid (e.g. with --xml) already? We could have just a
'--i-know-what-i-am-doing' kind of flag, like we have that '--unsafe'
one already.
Thank you for stepping in. But after some more investigation on my task the
libvirt functionality requirements I need changed. I'll describe them in a
different RFC.
Nikolay
> Nikolay
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list