On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:40:50PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
diff --git a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym index 88ca271..d345813 100644 --- a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym +++ b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym @@ -287,6 +287,19 @@ LIBVIRT_GOBJECT_0.2.2 { gvir_connection_get_networks;
gvir_interface_get_mac; + + gvir_ip_addr_type_get_type; + + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_clientid; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expirytime; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_hostname; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_iaid; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_iface; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_ip; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_ip_type; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_mac; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_prefix; + gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_type;
What about the second paragraph from https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-June/msg01649.html: « [snip] Just realized now, but wouldn't we be better off with gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_client_id; gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expiry_time; instead of gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_clientid; gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expirytime; » Christophe