On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:40:50PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
diff --git a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym
b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym
index 88ca271..d345813 100644
--- a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym
+++ b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym
@@ -287,6 +287,19 @@ LIBVIRT_GOBJECT_0.2.2 {
gvir_connection_get_networks;
gvir_interface_get_mac;
+
+ gvir_ip_addr_type_get_type;
+
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_clientid;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expirytime;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_hostname;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_iaid;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_iface;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_ip;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_ip_type;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_mac;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_prefix;
+ gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_type;
What about the second paragraph from
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-June/msg01649.html:
« [snip]
Just realized now, but wouldn't we be better off with
gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_client_id;
gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expiry_time;
instead of
gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_clientid;
gvir_network_dhcp_lease_get_expirytime; »
Christophe