Re: [PATCH 1/4] docs: securityprocess: Don't claim that we have maint branches

On 3/9/22 10:09, Peter Krempa wrote: > The 'Branch fixing policy' paragraph claims that we have at least one > actively maintained stable branch which isn't currently the case. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com&gt; > --- > docs/securityprocess.rst | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/securityprocess.rst b/docs/securityprocess.rst > index adddbf76b0..fe64e94f80 100644 > --- a/docs/securityprocess.rst > +++ b/docs/securityprocess.rst > @@ -84,8 +84,6 @@ engineers on the security team. > Branch fixing policy > -------------------- > > -The libvirt community maintains one or more stable release branches at any given > -point in time. The security team will aim to publish fixes for GIT master (which > -will become the next major release) and each currently maintained stable release > -branch. The distro maintainers will be responsible for backporting the > +The security team will publish fixes for GIT master (which will become the next > +major release). The distro maintainers will be responsible for backporting the > officially published fixes to other release branches where applicable. Yeah, we don't really do that, but removing is looks too harsh. Maybe mention that we might create a maint branch? OTOH, a crasher we had wasn't serious enough for us to create a maint branch: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2022-March/228906.html So in the end, off it goes.