7 Jan
2014
7 Jan
'14
10:31 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org> wrote:
The check for < 0 might be superfluos but freeing num entries instead of only r ones looks wrong to me since r is the number of allocated names, not num. I'm happy to send a patch dropping the < 0 part.
Oh, bah humbug. Yeah, you are definitely right about that. Please do send a patch with just the num -> r bit. That is definitely a bug. Thanks, Chris