Re: [PATCH] docs: Describe protected virtualization guest setup

On 4/29/20 5:15 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:08:31PM +0200, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > > > > > > On 4/29/20 3:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:58:02PM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote: > > > > From: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; > > > > > > > > Protected virtualization/IBM Secure Execution for Linux protects > > > > guest memory and state from the host. > > > > > > > > Add some basic information about technology and a brief guide > > > > on setting up secure guests with libvirt. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; > > > > Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; > > > > Reviewed-by: Paulo de Rezende Pinatti <ppinatti(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; > > > > --- > > > > docs/kbase.html.in | 3 + > > > > docs/kbase/protected_virtualization.rst | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > I'd suggest calling this s390_protected_virt.rst > > We can do that. > > > > > > > diff --git a/docs/kbase.html.in b/docs/kbase.html.in > > > > index c586e0f676..05a3239224 100644 > > > > --- a/docs/kbase.html.in > > > > +++ b/docs/kbase.html.in > > > > @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ > > > > <dt><a href="kbase/secureusage.html">Secure usage</a></dt> > > > > <dd>Secure usage of the libvirt APIs</dd> > > > > + <dt><a href="kbase/protected_virtualization.html">Protected virtualization</a></dt> > > > > > > "s390 Protected virtualization" as the title > > > > > The terminology that was used in the KVM upstream code is simply protected > > virtualization without a prefix, so I'd avoid creating a new denomination in > > libvirt. > > Putting an "s390" prefix on this isn't inventing new terminology - it is > just making it obvious to users what target it applies to. Daniel & Viktor: Would calling it "Protected virtualization on s390" serve both of you?