On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:32:17PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com> writes:
>> Would you agree with something like this?
>>
>> <filesystem type='mount'>
>> <device name="mtp share">mtp</device>
>> ...
>
> What is the name="mtp share" bit trying to reflect ?
>
> It seems we're mostly biased towards <model> so I think we should aim
> for <model type='mtp|9p'/>
it is the name of the MTP share within the guest. How will it look with
<model>?
For the name of the guest share we'll use the existing <target
path='....'>
element. Yes 'path' is a misleading name - it doesn't have to be a path it
can be any string - this is what we do for 9p already.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|