On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:32:17PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
Would you agree with something like this?
<filesystem type='mount'> <device name="mtp share">mtp</device> ...
What is the name="mtp share" bit trying to reflect ?
It seems we're mostly biased towards <model> so I think we should aim for <model type='mtp|9p'/>
it is the name of the MTP share within the guest. How will it look with <model>?
For the name of the guest share we'll use the existing <target path='....'> element. Yes 'path' is a misleading name - it doesn't have to be a path it can be any string - this is what we do for 9p already. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|