On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:36:16AM -0500, John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:19:06PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > I'm not sure I understand why this is impossible ?
> >
> > I thought the purpose of xenmigr:/// was to allow live migration the
> > traditional way without needing a remotely accessible libvirtd. At
> > least, that's how we're using it. If it's the intention of libvirt
that
> > you must always have a listening remote API, then we'll have to work out
> > a private fix for our tree.
Could you answer this bit? It sounds like from your other comment that
the above is true.
Yes, the migrate API requires a connection to both libvirtd daemons,
source and destination.
We're not going to *require* libvirtd to listen across the
network when
there's an existing mechanism, so it sounds like we'll have to fork this
part.
You can use the xen+ssh://hostname/ URI for the destination if you don't
want libvirtd to listen publically
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|