On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Laine Stump <laine(a)laine.org> wrote:
On 12/07/2012 10:08 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> From: liguang <lig.fnst(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> original migration did not aware of offline case,
> so, try to support offline migration quietly
> (did not disturb original migration) by pass
> VIR_MIGRATE_OFFLINE flag to migration APIs if only
> the domain is really inactive, and
> migration process will not puzzled by domain
> offline and exit unexpectedly.
> these changes did not take care of disk images the
> domain required, for them could be transferred by
> other APIs as suggested, then VIR_MIGRATE_OFFLINE
> must not combined with VIR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_*.
> and you must do a persistent migration at same time,
> do "virsh migrate --offline --persistent ...".
This commit message is *very* confusing. Maybe before pushing you could
rewrite it to make sense to an outsider?
Agreed. If you look at some of my past comments to older version of
the patch I rewrote it with a lot more detail.
--
Doug Goldstein