On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:32 PM Jason Dillaman <jdillama@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:55 AM Han Han <hhan@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:09 PM Jason Dillaman <jdillama@redhat.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:52 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <
berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:19:59PM +0800, Han Han wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:01 PM Jason Dillaman <jdillama@redhat.com>
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:50 AM Han Han <hhan@redhat.com> wrote: > > Diff from v3: > - add the check for capability of rbd namespace > - rename the item of rbd namespace in disk source struct > - combine the commit of doc into the commit of patch > - remove the code for -drive > > gitlab branch: > https://gitlab.com/hhan2/libvirt/-/commits/rbd-namespace-v4 > > Han Han (4): > qemu_capabilities: Add QEMU_CAPS_RBD_NAMESPACE > conf: Support to parse rbd namespace attribute > qemu: Implement rbd namespace attribute > news: qemu: Support rbd namespace > > NEWS.rst | 6 +++ > docs/formatdomain.rst | 5 ++- > docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 3 ++ > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 4 ++ > src/qemu/qemu_block.c | 1 + > src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 4 ++ > src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 3 ++ > src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 8 ++++ > src/util/virstoragefile.h | 1 + > .../caps_5.0.0.aarch64.xml | 1 + > .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.0.0.ppc64.xml | 1 + > .../caps_5.0.0.riscv64.xml | 1 + > .../caps_5.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 + > .../caps_5.1.0.x86_64.xml | 1 + > ...k-network-rbd-namespace.x86_64-latest.args | 41
+++++++++++++++++++
> .../disk-network-rbd-namespace.xml | 33 +++++++++++++++ > tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 1 + > ...sk-network-rbd-namespace.x86_64-latest.xml | 41 +++++++++++++++++++ > tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 1 + > 19 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644
tests/qemuxml2argvdata/disk-network-rbd-namespace.x86_64-latest.args
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/disk-network-rbd-namespace.xml > create mode 100644 https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/libvir/msg201067.html
tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/disk-network-rbd-namespace.x86_64-latest.xml
> > -- > 2.27.0 >
Hopefully you still plan to add a "pool" attribute in a future series to help split-up the overloaded "pool/image" name attribute.
From my opinions, I think it's ok to keep "pool/image" in the name attribute if the meaning of this attribute is clarified in libvirt docs. Currently I have no plan to split the "pool/image".
The problem is that having separate "<pool>/<image>" and "<pool-name>"
<pool-name> ? I am confused here. Do you mean the pool-namespace?
Yes
attributes is semi-nonsensicle. At that point, you might as well just
I think the only separated namespace is sensible here. Because there are 3 ways to express the rbd image path with namespace:
Except "pool-namespace" is not a standalone property, it's tied to the pool that you are hiding in the "name". A "pool-namespace" of "ns1" in pool "pool1" is not the same as the namespace "ns1" in pool "pool2". Like I said, you seem to be developing your own unique RBD image-spec format.
1. <pool>/<namespace>/<image> e.g: the rbd info comand and the qemu-img comand with legacy rbd path: ➜ ~ rbd -c ~/.ceph/ceph.conf -k ~/.ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring info rbd/hhan/1 rbd image '1': size 100 MiB in 25 objects
$ rbd namespace create rbd/ns1 $ rbd create --size 1G rbd/ns1/image1 $ rbd info rbd/ns1/image1 rbd image 'image1': size 1 GiB in 256 objects ... snip ...
The rbd CLI will always treat that middle section as a namespace so for your example it would be pool rbd, namespace hhan, and image name 1.
... ➜ ~ qemu-img info rbd:rbd/hhan/1:conf=/home/hhan/.ceph/ceph.conf:id=admin:key=XXXXXXX image: json:{"driver": "raw", "file": {"pool": "rbd", "image": "1", "conf": "/home/hhan/.ceph/ceph.conf", "driver": "rbd", "user": "admin"}} file format: raw ... Note that the missing namespace attribute in image json is caused by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821528
2. only separated namespace: <pool>/><image> and namespace attribute or option e.g: the rbd command with namespace option ➜ ~ rbd -c ~/.ceph/ceph.conf -k ~/.ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring info rbd/1 --namespace hhan rbd image '1': size 100 MiB in 25 objects order 22 (4 MiB objects) ...
3. separated pool, namespace, image e.g: qemu blockdev options of rbd: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/30aa19446d82358a30eac3b556b4d6641e00b7c1/q... ➜ ~ qemu-img info 'json:{"driver": "raw", "file": {"pool": "rbd", "image": "1", "conf": "/home/hhan/.ceph/ceph.conf", "driver": "rbd", "user": "admin", "namespace":"hhan"}}' image: json:{"driver": "raw", "file": {"pool": "rbd", "image": "1", "conf": "/home/hhan/.ceph/ceph.conf", "driver": "rbd", "user": "admin"}} file format: raw ...
From these precedents, I think it is no problem to use the 2nd pattern in libvirt XML. I reject the 1st pattern because of compat issues. Suppose the 1st pattern is used, it will cause problems in the following case. Since rbd allows the image name contains '/'
That's not true, RBD has not permitted "/" in pool nor image names for years -- and it's definitely not allowed when creating images in namespaces:
$ rbd create --size 1G rbd/ns1/image1/ rbd: invalid spec 'rbd/ns1/image1/' $ rbd create --size 1G --pool rbd --namespace ns1 --image "image1/" rbd: invalid spec 'image1/'
I am not sure how I created the image 'hhan/2' in the default namespace. It cannot be created by rbd command now. However it seems buggy on qemu-img(librbd1-12.2.7-9.el8.x86_64 qemu-img-5.1.0-3.module+el8.3.0+7708+740a1315.x86_64): ➜ ~ rbd -c ~/.ceph/ceph.conf -k ~/.ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring namespace ls NAME hhan test ➜ ~ qemu-img create 'rbd:rbd/aa/new1:conf=/root/.ceph/ceph.conf:id=admin:key=AQBm9fldc9zhMhAAeDDedFhu55XjV1YhdqDOkQ==' 1M Formatting 'rbd:rbd/aa/new1:conf=/root/.ceph/ceph.conf:id=admin:key=AQBm9fldc9zhMhAAeDDedFhu55XjV1YhdqDOkQ==', fmt=raw size=1048576 ➜ ~ qemu-img create 'rbd:rbd/aa/new1:conf=/root/.ceph/ceph.conf:id=admin:key=AQBm9fldc9zhMhAAeDDedFhu55XjV1YhdqDOkQ==' 1M Formatting 'rbd:rbd/aa/new1:conf=/root/.ceph/ceph.conf:id=admin:key=AQBm9fldc9zhMhAAeDDedFhu55XjV1YhdqDOkQ==', fmt=raw size=1048576 qemu-img: rbd:rbd/aa/new1:conf=/root/.ceph/ceph.conf:id=admin:key=AQBm9fldc9zhMhAAeDDedFhu55XjV1YhdqDOkQ==: error rbd create: File exists ➜ ~ rbd -c ~/.ceph/ceph.conf -k ~/.ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring namespace ls NAME hhan test ➜ ~ rbd -c ~/.ceph/ceph.conf -k ~/.ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring -p rbd ls|grep new1 ➜ ~ qemu-img info rbd:rbd/aa/new1:conf=/root/.ceph/ceph.conf:id=admin:key=AQBm9fldc9zhMhAAeDDedFhu55XjV1YhdqDOkQ== image: json:{"driver": "raw", "file": {"pool": "rbd", "image": "new1", "conf": "/root/.ceph/ceph.conf", "driver": "rbd", "user": "admin"}} file format: raw virtual size: 1 MiB (1048576 bytes) disk size: unavailable cluster_size: 4194304 Well, the image "rbd/aa/new1" could be found by qemu-img but cannot be listed by rbd. Very confusing here. Since the '/' in image name is invalid, the format of name attribute "<pool>/[pool-ns]<image>" is more sensible. I will adapt that in the next patch series.
Is this a bug in "qemu-img" that allowed you to create "hhan/2" below? Does it allow you to create that image in a namespace or does your example no longer work? QEMU should also parse that middle section as the namespace [1].
➜ ~ rbd -c ~/.ceph/ceph.conf -k ~/.ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring -p rbd ls attach-new copy hhan/2
If I used 'hhan/2' image in libvirt XML at the previous libvirt and then I updated libvirt to the version support 1st pattern, the new libvirt parse the name='rbd/hhan/2' as pool 'rbd', namespace 'hhan', image '2',instead of the pool 'rbd', image 'hhan/2', default namespace.
For the 3rd pattern, separating all the attributes, the xml will look like <source protocol="rbd" pool="POOL" image="IMG" namespace="NS">
However it cannot replace the old attribute name='<pool>/<image>' because of the compatibility. What about keeping the old attribute the adapting this new pattern? Well, it looks weird only rbd protocol adapts this new pattern because all the network protocols in libvirt use the old xml pattern <source protocol="PROTO" name="XX"> (seeing the examples in https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#hard-drives-floppy-disks-cdroms) How about adapting this new pattern to all the network protocols? Considering the effort and the benifits of that, I think it is not worthwhile.
drop the "pool_namespace" attribute" and parse the image name just like the rest of Ceph/RBD code does as "[<pool-name>/[<pool_namespace>/]]<image-name>". Why should libvirt invent its own custom way to describe the image location?
See this thread here [1] from back in April where you said you would split it out.
Yes. The above is why I changed my mind and decided to use the only separated attribute namespace.
That would create back compat issues too, so I can't see us splitting that.
Yes, I understand the backwards compatibility concerns so you would need to continue to support "<pool>/<image>", but you could at least force the new format if a "<pool-namespace>" was specified.
Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
[1] https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/libvir/msg201067.html
-- Jason
-- Best regards, ----------------------------------- Han Han Senior Quality Engineer Redhat.
Email: hhan@redhat.com Phone: +861065339333
[1] https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/master/block/rbd.c#L150
-- Jason
-- Best regards, ----------------------------------- Han Han Senior Quality Engineer Redhat. Email: hhan@redhat.com Phone: +861065339333