On 10/20/21 1:18 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 13:07:59 +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 10/6/21 3:32 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:08:34 +0200
>> Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> 2) In my experiments I try to mimic what libvirt does. Here's my cmd
> line:
>
> qemu-system-x86_64 \
> -S \
> -preconfig \
> -cpu host \
> -smp 120,sockets=2,dies=3,cores=4,threads=5 \
> -object
'{"qom-type":"memory-backend-memfd","id":"ram-node0","size":4294967296,"host-nodes":[0],"policy":"bind"}'
\
> -numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram-node0 \
> -no-user-config \
> -nodefaults \
> -no-shutdown \
> -qmp stdio
>
> and here is my QMP log:
>
> {"QMP": {"version": {"qemu": {"micro": 50,
"minor": 1, "major": 6}, "package":
"v6.1.0-1552-g362534a643"}, "capabilities": ["oob"]}}
>
> {"execute":"qmp_capabilities"}
> {"return": {}}
>
> {"execute":"query-hotpluggable-cpus"}
> {"return": [{"props": {"core-id": 3,
"thread-id": 4, "die-id": 2, "socket-id": 1},
"vcpus-count": 1, "type": "host-x86_64-cpu"},
{"props": {"core-id": 3, "thread-id": 3, "die-id":
2, "socket-id": 1}, "vcpus-count": 1, "type":
"host-x86_64-cpu"}, {"props": {"core-id": 3,
"thread-id": 2, "die-id": 2, "socket-id": 1},
"vcpus-count": 1, "type": "host-x86_64-cpu"},
{"props": {"core-id": 3, "thread-id": 1, "die-id":
2, "socket-id": 1}, "vcpus-count": 1, "type":
"host-x86_64-cpu"}, {"props": {"core-id": 3,
"thread-id": 0, "die-id": 2, "socket-id": 1},
"vcpus-count": 1, "type": "host-x86_64-cpu"},
{"props": {"core-id": 2, "thread-id": 4, "die-id":
2, "socket-id": 1}, "vcpus-count": 1, "type":
"host-x86_64-cpu"},
> <snip/>
> {"props": {"core-id": 0, "thread-id": 0,
"die-id": 0, "socket-id": 0}, "vcpus-count": 1,
"type": "host-x86_64-cpu"}]}
>
>
> I can see that query-hotpluggable-cpus returns an array. Can I safely
> assume that vCPU ID == index in the array? I mean, if I did have -numa
No, this assumption would be incorrect on the aforementioned PPC
platform where one entry in the returned array can describe multiple
cores.
qemuDomainFilterHotplugVcpuEntities is the code that cross-references
the libvirt "index" with the data returned by query-hotpluggable cpus.
The important bit is the 'vcpus-count' property. The code which deals
with hotplug is already fetching everything that's needed.
Ah, I see. So my assumption would be correct if vcpus-count would be 1
for all entries. If it isn't then I need to account for how much
vcpus-count is in each entity. Fair enough. But
qemuDomainFilterHotplugVcpuEntities() doesn't really do vCPU ID ->
[socket, core, thread] translation, does it?
But even if it did, I am still wondering what the purpose of this whole
exercise is. QEMU won't be able to drop ID -> [socket, core, thread]
mapping. The only thing it would be able to drop is a few lines of code
handling command line. Am I missing something obvious?
Michal