On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:24:31PM -0400, Hugh O. Brock wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:54:55PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 06/21/2010 03:47 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> > > This patch adds a new --details option to the virsh pool-list
> > > command, making its output more useful to people who use virsh
> > > for significant lengths of time.
> > >
> > > Addresses BZ # 605543
> > >
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605543
> > >
> > > + /* Determine the total number of pools to list */
> > > + numAllPools = numActivePools + numInactivePools;
> > > + if (!numAllPools) {
> > > + /* No pools to list, so cleanup and return */
> > > + vshPrint(ctl, "%s\n", _("No matching pools to
display"));
> > > + return TRUE;
> > > + }
> >
> > This is a change in behavior, even when the user didn't specify
> > --details. Might it cause any backward compatibility issues in
> > scripting, or are we okay with the change?
>
> Correct, we shouldn't change this behaviour - it'll break apps parsing
> the output
FWIW Rich Jones complains that the output as it stands is nigh on
unparseable anyway. Perhaps we should consider that a bug, and fix
it...
That's unrelated to this patch really.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
:|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|