'virStoragePoolObjListSearch' explicitly documents that it's returning
a pointer to a locked and ref'd pool that maches the lookup function.
This was not the case as in commit 0c4b391e2a9 (released in
libvirt-8.3.0) the code was accidentally converted to use 'VIR_LOCK_GUARD'
which auto-unlocked it when leaving the scope, even when the code was
originally "leaking" the lock.
Revert the corresponding conversion and add a comment that this function
is intentionally leaking a locked object.
Fixes: 0c4b391e2a9
Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221851
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>
---
src/conf/virstorageobj.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/conf/virstorageobj.c b/src/conf/virstorageobj.c
index 7010e97d61..59fa5da372 100644
--- a/src/conf/virstorageobj.c
+++ b/src/conf/virstorageobj.c
@@ -454,11 +454,16 @@ virStoragePoolObjListSearchCb(const void *payload,
virStoragePoolObj *obj = (virStoragePoolObj *) payload;
struct _virStoragePoolObjListSearchData *data =
(struct _virStoragePoolObjListSearchData *)opaque;
- VIR_LOCK_GUARD lock = virObjectLockGuard(obj);
+ virObjectLock(obj);
+
+ /* If we find the matching pool object we must return while the object is
+ * locked as the caller wants to return a locked object. */
if (data->searcher(obj, data->opaque))
return 1;
+ virObjectUnlock(obj);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.41.0