On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote: Hi Michal,
I am not sure we want *rename virsh commands. Not only for storage, but in general. And even if we do want these, they don't require a new API. They can be implemented with simple vir*GetXML(); vir*Define(); vir*Undefine();
It was reported here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760795.
4, Move volume from one pool to another. I will develop 'virsh vol-move xxx' option for virsh tool.
This one makes more sense, however I am worried about difficulty a bit. A GSoC project should take 3 months for a student to complete. This is something that even unexperienced user can accomplish in less than a month.
Maybe it is a bit difficulty. However, I wanna have a try and i think other GSOCers have the same thoughts. This would be more exciting and really make more sense for our Libvirt community, isn't it? Michal, thanks for your comments. -- Thanks Harry Wei