On 06/23/2010 01:13 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 01:08:40PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/23/2010 12:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>> libvirt_driver_test_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version
>>>> +libvirt_driver_test_la_LIBADD = libvirt.la ../gnulib/lib/libgnu.la
>> I don't think it is right to link to libvirt.la here or with other
>> driver modules.
>>
>> The libvirtd daemon links to libvirt.la already, and is built such
>> that all exported symbols are available to modules that are dlopen()d
>> Thus it should be sufficient to add symbols to libvirt_private.syms
>> and not link to libvirt.la in driver modules.
>
> I don't think that works on Windows. Windows DLLs must not have
> undefined symbols. They do not get "magic" access to symbols exported
> by previously loaded libraries and (as in this case) programs.
libtool can get around that limitation if you use its libltdl library,
Too painful to be useful. :)
but to be honest I don't really care very mcuh. Ee don't even
build
libvirtd on windows currently, and even if we did, it isn't a show
stopper to just build libvirtd in the traditional way without using
the dlopen support.
Agreed.
Paolo