Stefan de Konink wrote:
Chris Lalancette schreef:
> 4) Further lessen our dependence on direct calls to iscsiadm, in case they
> change the output in the future.
How are you looking against this previous proposed setup where we will
give an updated Makefile to the open-iscsi folks (to build
libopen-iscsi.so) and implement an specific open-iscsi iscsi driver that
uses the exact same functions as open-iscsi does itself?
Yeah, it's not a bad plan at all. Someone just needs to work with upstream
open-iscsi tools to split their stuff out into a library. I'm totally for this
type of implementation; not only will we not have to fork and exec for some of
this stuff, we should be able to get better error messages as well.
That being said, until this sort of change makes it upstream, we have to work
with what we've got at the moment.
Chris Lalancette