On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 09:35 +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:33:09PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>
> I didn't say it would be hard :)
>
> I just said that such compatibility code would have to be kept
> around forever. We already support lots and lots of similar cases
> in libvirt, the difference being that in this case we would add
> support for a new command *knowing in advance* that it will become
> obsolete as soon as a proper implementation is available.
>
> It might still be the right thing to do! I just want to make sure
> everything's been properly considered and discussed beforehand.
I totally agree with you to think more before doing. :)
So, anyone else willing to give their $0.2 on how to implement
this The Right Way™?
I just skimmed the whole thread again and it doesn't look to me
like any consensus has been reached.
Cheers.
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team