On 23.04.2015 11:32, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:19:34 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 23.04.2015 10:30, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:44:49 +0800, zhang bo wrote:
>>> The function qemuBuildCommandLine() may take a long time, for example
>>> if we configure tens of vifs for the guest, each may cost hundrands of
>>> milliseconds to create tap dev, senconds in total. Thus, unlock vm
>>> before calling it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Bo <oscar.zhangbo(a)huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Yimin <zhouyimin(a)huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 6 +++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>>> index 753afe8..d1aaaec 100644
>>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
>>> @@ -4628,14 +4628,18 @@ int qemuProcessStart(virConnectPtr conn,
>>> }
>>>
>>> VIR_DEBUG("Building emulator command line");
>>> + virObjectUnlock(vm);
>>> if (!(cmd = qemuBuildCommandLine(conn, driver, vm->def,
priv->monConfig,
>>> priv->monJSON, priv->qemuCaps,
>>> migrateFrom, stdin_fd, snapshot, vmop,
>>> &buildCommandLineCallbacks, false,
>>> qemuCheckFips(),
>>> priv->autoNodeset,
>>> - &nnicindexes, &nicindexes)))
>>> + &nnicindexes, &nicindexes))) {
>>> + virObjectLock(vm);
>>> goto cleanup;
>>> + }
>>> + virObjectLock(vm);
>>
>> Why do you need to unlock the object? The VM is starting at this point
>> so you won't be able to save any time since APIs will either be blocked
>> by a job or by the fact that the VM was not started.
>
> Not true. We still allow QUERY jobs, or APIs that lock a domain object
> but don't necessarily take a job. For instance, if in one thread I'm
> doing virDomainGetOSType(), virDomainGetInfo(), ... (essentially 'virsh
> dominfo') while the other just starts the domain. I don't see a reason
> why virDomainGetOSType() should wait for the domain to be started up.
> Domain state should have no affect on the guest OS type, should it?
OK that is technically right. I wanted to point out that most of the
stats are available only for online machines or it shouldn't be much of
a problem to dealy the delivery.
Your example certainly doesn't illustrate why the delay to format the
command line should be a problem when using libvirt. Or are you polling
virDomainGetOSType every millisecond?
I am curious to see why the delay would be a problem.
Yep, I'm too. So far we don't really care much about libvirt response
time (otherwise our critical sections would be much shorter), but maybe
it's an issue for somebody.
>
> On the other hand, I don't think we can just lock and unlock the domain
> object as we please. qemuBuildCommandLine is a very complex function and
> as such it calls many others. Some of them may rely on the fact, that
> the object is locked by caller.
Well, you definitely can't since almost everything in there is accessing
vm->def. Locking semantics would be broken right in the line after @vm
was unlocked by dereferencing it.
Well, anything that would change a domain definition should grap a
MODIFY job. But such jobs are serialized, so even if we unlock the
domain we should be okay to still access vm->def. What I am more worried
about are all the small functions that interact with system or
something. Currently they are serialized by @vm lock, but one we remove
it ...
Michal