On 1/28/21 4:15 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
Sadly, the replies changes for older QEMUs are synthetic.
Separated for easier review.
Also available on gitlab:
git fetch
https://gitlab.com/janotomko/libvirt/ virtiofs-bootindex
https://gitlab.com/janotomko/libvirt/-/tree/virtiofs-bootindex
And a broken pipeline:
https://gitlab.com/janotomko/libvirt/-/pipelines/248162273
Ján Tomko (7):
tests: switch vhost-user-fs-hugepages to use boot order
conf: add boot order to filesystem
qemu: add QEMU_CAPS_VHOST_USER_FS_BOOTINDEX
fixup: vhost-user-fs-device properties
fixup: renumber
Add validation for virtiofs boot order setting
qemu: format bootindex for vhost-user-fs
docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 3 +
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 5 +-
src/conf/domain_validate.c | 17 ++-
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 8 +
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 +
src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 3 +
src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 6 +
.../caps_4.2.0.aarch64.replies | 131 ++++++++++++----
.../caps_4.2.0.s390x.replies | 119 ++++++++++++---
.../caps_4.2.0.x86_64.replies | 131 ++++++++++++----
.../caps_5.0.0.aarch64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++----
.../caps_5.0.0.ppc64.replies | 124 +++++++++++++---
.../caps_5.0.0.riscv64.replies | 120 ++++++++++++---
.../caps_5.0.0.x86_64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++----
.../caps_5.1.0.x86_64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++----
.../caps_5.2.0.aarch64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++----
.../caps_5.2.0.ppc64.replies | 124 +++++++++++++---
.../caps_5.2.0.riscv64.replies | 120 ++++++++++++---
.../caps_5.2.0.s390x.replies | 124 +++++++++++++---
.../caps_5.2.0.x86_64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++----
.../caps_6.0.0.x86_64.replies | 140 ++++++++++++++----
.../caps_6.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
...vhost-user-fs-hugepages.x86_64-latest.args | 3 +-
.../vhost-user-fs-hugepages.xml | 3 +-
24 files changed, 1534 insertions(+), 329 deletions(-)
Hopefully, you'll squash 4/7 and 5/7 into 3/7 so that we're able to
compile && test after each commit.
Also, news entry would be nice (it's fine a follow up patch).
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
Michal