On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:43:48PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:29:21PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Debian systems numad gets installed to /usr/bin. However some people
> > use usrmerge[0] which links /bin to /usr/bin. By changing the lookup
> > order we make sure the daemon is always found in /usr/bin (with or
> > without usrmerge installed).
> >
> > This allows packages built on systems with usrmerge to run on systems
> > without usrmerge which would otherwise fail since /bin/numad would be
> > hardcoded into libvirt.
> >
> > Originally-Submitted-By: Guilhem Moulin
> > References:
http://bugs.debian.org/843878
> > [0]:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/usrmerge
> > ---
> > configure.ac | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> > index 3ff4c42..65bcd4d 100644
> > --- a/configure.ac
> > +++ b/configure.ac
> > @@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ AC_ARG_WITH([numad],
> > if test "$with_numad" != "no" ; then
> > fail=0
> >
> > - AC_PATH_PROG([NUMAD], [numad], [], [/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin])
> > + AC_PATH_PROG([NUMAD], [numad], [], [/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin])
> >
>
> Won't the same problem be there with iptables (the first one I saw in
> configure.ac) and maybe others?
AC_PATH_PROG looks like
AC_PATH_PROG (variable, prog-to-check-for, [value-if-not-found], [path])
and iptables has
AC_PATH_PROG([IPTABLES_PATH], [iptables], /sbin/iptables, [/usr/sbin:$PATH])
so the /sbin for iptables is used if it's not found. Since the lookup
Oh yeah, so those with /bin (or /sbin) mentioned first will have a
problem.
starts at /usr/sbin everything is fine here. But this block will fail
entierely:
dnl External programs that we can use if they are available.
dnl We will hard-code paths to these programs unless we cannot
dnl detect them, in which case we'll search for the program
dnl along the $PATH at runtime and fail if it's not there.
…
That's what I was looking for and couldn't find. Good to know I
remembered it correctly that it's there.
since all the item below that have /sbin first. I missed that in my
initial grep since it's wrapped on several lines.
Looking further I found several tools that have $PATH first on the list
like
AC_PATH_PROG([MOUNT], [mount], [], [$PATH:/sbin:/usr/sbin])
while others have it at the end (like iptables above). I think adding
$PATH first is preferable since distros (and users) can set that
properly and it would solve the numad case too. This would also solve
the numad case. I'll send a patch that does just that.
Cheers,
-- Guido
$PATH should be first, and I think we only need to append
':/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin' for those binaries that might be
there when you're building as non-root (on distro where non-root users
don't have sbin directories in $PATH). Everything else should omit the
last parameter and let default AC_PATH_PROG to $PATH IMHO.
So we could define our_SPATH="$PATH:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin" in
the configure and just use that or nothing in the whole configure.ac So
that we don't run into similar problems as this (or 56022a293cea) again.
>
> Also, this should also include $PATH, similarly to *all other* places in
> the code =D It was removed by mistake 11 days after its introduction
> 4,5 years ago =)
>
> > if test "$with_numad" = "check"; then
> > test "$with_numactl" = "yes" || fail=1
> > --
> > 2.10.2
> >
> > --
> > libvir-list mailing list
> > libvir-list(a)redhat.com
> >
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list