On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:11:12AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:49:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:40:30AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> The distinction of a 'container' element makes sense since container based
> virtualization does have very different metadata than that used for hypervisor
> based virt.
>
> For data with it though, can we stick to the same style & syntax used
> elsewhere in the XML. eg something closer to
>
> <network hostname='fc7-openvz'>
> <ip address='192.168.1.101'/>
> <gateway address='192.168.1.101'/>
> </network>
Right but for some reason I could not find the place where we discribe the
network syntax when writing my mail. This describes the domain side
http://libvirt.org/format.html#Net1
but I can't find the network XML description ...
there is no description of gateway in the format page, and ip is described
once but there is no example, but yes we should follow this.
Yes, the networking XML is a missing bit of the websites. The following
snippet illustrates all the important constructs:
<network>
<name>default</name>
<bridge name="virbr0" />
<forward/>
<ip address="192.168.122.1" netmask="255.255.255.0">
<dhcp>
<range start="192.168.122.2" end="192.168.122.254" />
</dhcp>
</ip>
</network>
Regards,
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|