Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/6] Introduce new XMLs to specify disk source using storage pool/vol
On 2013年01月26日 03:12, Laine Stump wrote:
On 01/24/2013 10:44 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
>
> So you agreed with just using the "pool name and volume name"?
I think so. Unless you can think of a situation where the pool or volume
name legitimately wouldn't be known, or would be required to be
different from one machine to another in spite of the path/key/etc being
the same.
Hum, this inspires me thinking about the migration. The source and
dest host could have pool && vol with the same name. However, the
vol's content could be different. I.E, in this case, we will need
the globally unique $IDs (pool UUID, and/or vol key).
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list