28 Jan
2013
28 Jan
'13
4:27 a.m.
On 2013年01月26日 03:12, Laine Stump wrote:
On 01/24/2013 10:44 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
So you agreed with just using the "pool name and volume name"?
I think so. Unless you can think of a situation where the pool or volume name legitimately wouldn't be known, or would be required to be different from one machine to another in spite of the path/key/etc being the same.
Hum, this inspires me thinking about the migration. The source and dest host could have pool && vol with the same name. However, the vol's content could be different. I.E, in this case, we will need the globally unique $IDs (pool UUID, and/or vol key).
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list