On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:29:38PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:26 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:16:00PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Add a Red Hat style init script, using the service name
> > libvirt_qemud.
>
> I'm wondering about the future where we have Rich's libvirtd to start
> up too. Perhaps we should call the init script just 'libvirtd' and
> in the future it can either start both libvirt_qemud & libvirtd or
> if we merge the two, just start libvirtd. That way we won't have to
> worry about possible renaming of the init script during an update.
Sounds good to me, how about just re-naming the daemon to libvirtd
too ?
That'll cause a bit of an annoying namespace clash with Rich's existing
code for libvirtd. I think it'll be fine to keep it as libvirt_qemud
for now, because the user will never be directly exposed to this name,
it'll either autospawn (unprivileged users), or be started indirectly
with the init script.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|