
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 02:08:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 06/27/2011 08:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This guts the current remote driver, removing all its networking handling code. Instead it calls out to the new virClientPtr and virClientProgramPtr APIs for all RPC & networking work. --- src/Makefile.am | 5 +- src/remote/remote_driver.c | 3452 ++++++++------------------------------------ src/rpc/gendispatch.pl | 14 +- 3 files changed, 586 insertions(+), 2885 deletions(-) @@ -1222,6 +1222,7 @@ endif libvirt_net_rpc_la_CFLAGS = \ $(GNUTLS_CFLAGS) \ $(SASL_CFLAGS) \ + $(XDR_CFLAGS) \
Should this hunk be done as a separate patch?
Yeah, should do really.
+++ b/src/remote/remote_driver.c @@ -23,51 +23,14 @@
+#include "virnetclient.h" +#include "virnetclientprogram.h" +#include "virnetclientstream.h" #include "virterror_internal.h" #include "logging.h" #include "datatypes.h"
'make syntax-check' is calling you for not removing the now-unused #include "ignore-value.h".
Aargh. This needs yet another rebase to pick up the revert of BlockPull patches:
remote/remote_driver.c:263:7: error: 'REMOTE_PROC_DOMAIN_EVENT_BLOCK_PULL' undeclared here (not in a function) remote/remote_driver.c:265:14: error: 'remote_domain_event_block_pull_msg' undeclared here (not in a function) remote/remote_driver.c:266:18: error: 'xdr_remote_domain_event_block_pull_msg' undeclared here (not in a function) cc1: warnings being treated as errors remote/remote_driver.c:222:1: error: 'remoteDomainBuildEventBlockPull' used but never defined
Yeah, I messed that rebase up & have fixed that by removing those unused pieces.
@@ -107,119 +70,27 @@
static int inside_daemon = 0;
-struct remote_thread_call; - - -enum { - REMOTE_MODE_WAIT_TX, - REMOTE_MODE_WAIT_RX, - REMOTE_MODE_COMPLETE, - REMOTE_MODE_ERROR, -};
Replaced by virnetclient.c, but that enum only has MODE_WAIT_TX, MODE_WAIT_RX, and MODE_COMPLETE - I'm hoping that dropping the MODE_ERROR works out.
Yes, I merged MODE_COMPLETE and MODE_ERROR, into the single MODE_COMPLETE and now distinguish error conditons by just looking to see if the virError object has been set.
+static void +remoteDomainBuildEventLifecycle(virNetClientProgramPtr prog ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + virNetClientPtr client ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, + void *evdata, void *opaque);
Is it worth rearranging this file to be in topological order, to avoid having to use quite as many forward declarations? But that should be a separate followup patch.
@@ -524,12 +431,6 @@ doRemoteOpen (virConnectPtr conn, } else if (STRCASEEQ (var->name, "no_tty")) { no_tty = atoi (var->value); var->ignore = 1; - } else if (STRCASEEQ (var->name, "debug")) { - if (var->value && - STRCASEEQ (var->value, "stdout")) - priv->debugLog = stdout; - else - priv->debugLog = stderr; } else if (STRCASEEQ(var->name, "pkipath")) {
I'm not sure why this hunk is here.
The 'priv->debugLog' variable was not used anywhere, so I killed it. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|