16 Jan
2013
16 Jan
'13
6:59 p.m.
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:28:39 -0500
if you're not calling the kernel directly, why are you including the kernel headers ? what is the problem people are actually trying to address here (and no, "i want to include both headers" is not the answer) ?
When GLIBC doesn't provide it's own definition of some networking macros or interfaces that the kernel provides, people include the kernel header. This has been done for decades, wake up.