On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 18:46:08 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
Reject unsupported configurations.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
index eb8e82b545..4db0075b89 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
@@ -8276,8 +8276,37 @@ qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateFS(virDomainFSDefPtr fs,
return -1;
case VIR_DOMAIN_FS_DRIVER_TYPE_VIRTIOFS:
- /* TODO: vhost-user-fs-pci */
- return 0;
+ if (!fs->binary) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
+ _("missing virtiofs binary"));
"missing virtiofs binary path" perhaps?
Also the schema documents that the path is optional and the
documentation never mentions that the path must be provided. I also
didn't find any filling of a default, thus one of these is wrong.
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (fs->accessmode != VIR_DOMAIN_FS_ACCESSMODE_PASSTHROUGH) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
+ _("virtiofs only supports passthrough
accessmode"));
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (fs->wrpolicy != VIR_DOMAIN_FS_WRPOLICY_DEFAULT) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
+ _("virtiofs does not support wrpolicy"));
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (fs->model != VIR_DOMAIN_FS_MODEL_DEFAULT) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
+ _("virtiofs does not support model"));
+ return -1;
+ }
+ if (fs->format != VIR_STORAGE_FILE_NONE) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
+ _("virtiofs does not support format"));
+ return -1;
+ }
The schema should also reject this.
+ if (def->mem.access != VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_ACCESS_SHARED)
{
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
+ _("virtiofs requires shared memory"));
+ return -1;
+ }
+ break;
case VIR_DOMAIN_FS_DRIVER_TYPE_LAST:
default:
Except for the issue with the path to the virtiofs binary this patch
looks okay.