Re: [PATCH] docs: outline bug expectations wrt automated tools / AI agents

From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com&gt; Bug reports from automated tools and AI agents are time consuming to triage and have poor signal/noise ratio. Set strong expectations for any reporters using such tools, in a (likely doomed) attempt to stem the flow of poor quality reports. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com&gt; --- docs/bugs.rst | 14 ++++++++++++++ docs/securityprocess.rst | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/bugs.rst b/docs/bugs.rst index 5fd1970caf..e12a6c74ec 100644 --- a/docs/bugs.rst +++ b/docs/bugs.rst @@ -76,6 +76,20 @@ Linux Distribution specific bug reports like to have your procedure for filing bugs mentioned here, please mail the libvirt development list. +Use of automated tools / AI agents +---------------------------------- + +If any automated tool / AI agent is used to identify a bug / security +flaw, the following additional expectations apply when filing a report: + +- The tool / agent used **MUST** be clearly declared in the description +- All stated facts **MUST** be validated as correct and free from AI + hallucinations prior to filing +- The problem **MUST** be described against an upstream release that is + no more than 3 months old. +- The problem **SHOULD** be analysed and accompanied with a proposed + patch that can be directly applied to current git