On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:59:48AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:57:48PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
On Nov 8, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
No, not really. This is a completely different scenario. You haven't got two fundamentally different concepts here, this is just a Xen vs KVM vs VMWare scenario where you've just got different impls of the same concept.
So, I still reckon we should go ahead with this. :)
I don't agree.
Heh, ok. What's the better approach for this? Should we adjust to use something else like "guest" generically instead, or leave it as is, or ?
We should at least be consistent in what we use in virsh output. The command names are all 'dom-' and the libvirt API is virDomain*, so I've got a slight preference for domain, but guest works too.
I agree that we should be consistent. My $.02 is that guest is the most cross technology term, so I vote for that, but I think standardization is the most important thing. Dave