On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 01:24:37PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 12:43 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:50:51PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > +If you're interested in the full list of changes made to libvirt since
> > +the project was started, you can clone the git repository from
> > +
> > +
https://libvirt.org/git/libvirt.git
> > +
> > +and browse them locally using your favorite git history viewer or,
> > +alternatively, browse them online at
> > +
> > +
https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=log
>
> And this points the developer to the libvirt.git, which is already
> linked in README-hacking
I didn't consider the mention in README-hacking, though I'd say this
is slightly different because 1) it also points to the Web-browsable
version of the git log and 2) people looking for the ChangeLog will
probably not go poking at README-hacking of all places.
> I'd rather drop the ChangeLog file completely
I personally don't have a problem with the idea, but I seem to recall
a ChangeLog being required by the GNU coding standard, which we are
at least formally following; I expect moving away from it to be an at
least somewhat controversial change...
Okay, let's look into that later.
So perhaps we could get rid of the 12+ MiB of garbage right now, and
then suggest dropping these remaining dozen lines as a follow up? :)
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko(a)redhat.com>
Jano