On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:37:45AM +0800, Hyman wrote:
在 2022/1/13 0:22, Daniel P. Berrangé 写道:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:11:47AM +0800, huangy81(a)chinatelecom.cn wrote:
> > From: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81(a)chinatelecom.cn>
> >
> > When compile libvirt via ninja tool with default configuration,
> > it report the error message as the following:
> > "missing initializer for field 'path' of
'virTPMBinaryInfo'".
> > So initialize the 'path' field in 'virTPMBinaryInfo' with
'NULL'.
>
> I'm wondering why this isn't reported by our automated CI.
>
> What OS distro / GCC / CLang version are you seeing this with ?
The following is my work env:
OS distro: CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)
CentOS 7 is no longer a supported build platform for libvirt
(nor QEMU either)
GCC version: gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
That GCC is used in Ubuntu 18.04 and isn't issuing warnings
about this.
Finally -Wmissing-field-initializers is explicitly documented
as *not* issuing a warning for named fields
[quote "info gcc"]
'-Wmissing-field-initializers'
Warn if a structure's initializer has some fields missing. For
example, the following code causes such a warning, because 'x.h' is
implicitly zero:
struct s { int f, g, h; };
struct s x = { 3, 4 };
This option does not warn about designated initializers, so the
following modification does not trigger a warning:
struct s { int f, g, h; };
struct s x = { .f = 3, .g = 4 };
[/quote]
Given CentOS 7 is no longer a supported platform, we
can see GCC 7.5.0 works on other platforms, and the
-Wmissing-field-initializers warning isn';t supposed
to complain about this scenario, I don't want to take
this patch.
I'd also strongly encourage you to upgrade to a newer
development platform, given CentOS 7 is explicitly
not something the libvirt project wants to target
anymore.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|