Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] doc: clone+build instructions
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:32:00AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > A README in the top level directory exposing a GPL licence is
> > an invitation to confusion. So no I stand by this, too bad if this means
> > we need to rewrite the part instead of copying it.
>
> How about if I just remove the copyright notice from that new file
> (README-hacking)? Besides, then it'll be consistent with README,
> which has none.
Just fine by me :-) I assumed the copyright notice was there on purpose !
Pushed.
BTW, it was deliberate, in the original. Nearly every file in coreutils
(even ChangeLog!) has some sort of copyright notice. I toe the line
there, but sometimes it seems excessive.