On 03/08/2018 11:07 AM, Farhan Ali wrote:
A test case to test the virtio-gpu-ccw device.
Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- .../qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml | 18 ++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.args | 25 ++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 7 ++++ .../video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 14 ++++++++ 7 files changed, 171 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.args create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml
The tests look OK - could have been merged with the "functionality" patch, but it's OK that they're separate - as long as they exist it's a good thing. I assume the xml2xml output would be "valid" after the "capability" patch - if so you could extract it into it's own patch if you felt really compelled to do so. John