25 May
2015
25 May
'15
9:12 a.m.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:07:31PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/22/2015 08:01 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
Some virsh commands have a size parameter, which is handled as scaled integer. We don't have any *feature* that would allow to use '-1' as maximum size, so it's safe to reject any negative values for those commands.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159171
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com> --- tools/virsh.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
ACK, particularly since it gets hard to justify whether -1M and -1G would mean the same "maximum size".
Thanks, pushed now. Pavel