8 Apr
2011
8 Apr
'11
12:22 a.m.
On 03/17/2011 04:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 05:58:57PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote:
When the new maximum memory size becomes less than the current memory size, I think it is not the libvirt client but the each driver that decides the behavior (reject the operation or shrink the current memory size).
ACK
Pushed. Oh dear - we missed this one for 0.9.0, even though it was acked in plenty of time. I'm starting to agree with Laine's proposal that having a mailing-list based helper engine that parses out known pending patch series would be helpful to avoid losing these in the flurry of a busy inbox. -- Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org