Until now, this was a macro usable for direct initialization when a
variable is defined. Turning the macro into a function makes it more
general.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
---
src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
index b6a94d483a..6eef5cef00 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
@@ -189,8 +189,13 @@ struct _virCPUx86DataIterator {
};
-#define virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(data) \
- { data, -1 }
+static void
+virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(virCPUx86DataIteratorPtr iterator,
+ const virCPUx86Data *data)
+{
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter = { data, -1 };
+ *iterator = iter;
+}
static bool
@@ -540,9 +545,10 @@ static int
x86DataAdd(virCPUx86Data *data1,
const virCPUx86Data *data2)
{
- virCPUx86DataIterator iter = virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(data2);
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter;
virCPUx86DataItemPtr item;
+ virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&iter, data2);
while ((item = virCPUx86DataNext(&iter))) {
if (virCPUx86DataAddItem(data1, item) < 0)
return -1;
@@ -556,10 +562,11 @@ static void
x86DataSubtract(virCPUx86Data *data1,
const virCPUx86Data *data2)
{
- virCPUx86DataIterator iter = virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(data1);
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter;
virCPUx86DataItemPtr item1;
virCPUx86DataItemPtr item2;
+ virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&iter, data1);
while ((item1 = virCPUx86DataNext(&iter))) {
item2 = virCPUx86DataGet(data2, item1);
virCPUx86DataItemClearBits(item1, item2);
@@ -571,10 +578,11 @@ static void
x86DataIntersect(virCPUx86Data *data1,
const virCPUx86Data *data2)
{
- virCPUx86DataIterator iter = virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(data1);
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter;
virCPUx86DataItemPtr item1;
virCPUx86DataItemPtr item2;
+ virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&iter, data1);
while ((item1 = virCPUx86DataNext(&iter))) {
item2 = virCPUx86DataGet(data2, item1);
if (item2)
@@ -588,8 +596,9 @@ x86DataIntersect(virCPUx86Data *data1,
static bool
x86DataIsEmpty(virCPUx86Data *data)
{
- virCPUx86DataIterator iter = virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(data);
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter;
+ virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&iter, data);
return !virCPUx86DataNext(&iter);
}
@@ -598,10 +607,11 @@ static bool
x86DataIsSubset(const virCPUx86Data *data,
const virCPUx86Data *subset)
{
- virCPUx86DataIterator iter = virCPUx86DataIteratorInit((virCPUx86Data *)subset);
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter;
const virCPUx86DataItem *item;
const virCPUx86DataItem *itemSubset;
+ virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&iter, subset);
while ((itemSubset = virCPUx86DataNext(&iter))) {
if (!(item = virCPUx86DataGet(data, itemSubset)) ||
!virCPUx86DataItemMatchMasked(item, itemSubset))
@@ -1314,11 +1324,13 @@ x86ModelCompare(virCPUx86ModelPtr model1,
virCPUx86ModelPtr model2)
{
virCPUx86CompareResult result = EQUAL;
- virCPUx86DataIterator iter1 = virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&model1->data);
- virCPUx86DataIterator iter2 = virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&model2->data);
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter1;
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter2;
virCPUx86DataItemPtr item1;
virCPUx86DataItemPtr item2;
+ virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&iter1, &model1->data);
+ virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&iter2, &model2->data);
while ((item1 = virCPUx86DataNext(&iter1))) {
virCPUx86CompareResult match = SUPERSET;
@@ -1624,10 +1636,12 @@ virCPUx86GetMap(void)
static char *
virCPUx86DataFormat(const virCPUData *data)
{
- virCPUx86DataIterator iter = virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&data->data.x86);
+ virCPUx86DataIterator iter;
virCPUx86DataItemPtr item;
virBuffer buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER;
+ virCPUx86DataIteratorInit(&iter, &data->data.x86);
+
virBufferAddLit(&buf, "<cpudata arch='x86'>\n");
while ((item = virCPUx86DataNext(&iter))) {
virCPUx86CPUIDPtr cpuid;
--
2.22.0