16 Jun
2014
16 Jun
'14
5:46 p.m.
Il 16/06/2014 17:39, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
No, this is a (backwards-compatible) extension to how the option is parsed.
But numa started appearing on query-command-line-options only after this patch got applied. It is not the semantics I would expect from query-command-line-options, but it is a hint that we have a QEMU version with the new numa option handling code.
Oh, then indeed it's possible. I had forgotten that -numa was using ad hoc parsing code, not QemuOpts.
I suppose with QAPI introspection you could check if the QAPI type for -numa is defined... Does this exist, or is it just an idea?
Amos was working on it. Paolo