On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:32:38AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
On 11/22/12 11:03, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>
> I'll rework it to make it "as URI as possible" then. Just one
question,
> though (for anyone, I guess); why do we append port as a parameter for
> spice scheme?
>
> Martin
>
I think it's because of what spicy supported initially (since v0.1.0):
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=f0693b9f949ba
spice://<host>:<port> is supported since v0.8
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=b4c72ece9ca3b
and spice://<host>:<port>/ (with the trailing slash) since v0.12
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-gtk/commit/?id=50add15ef69cd
Another thing to keep in mind is that you can have both a port and a secure
port (over which data will transit through SSL).
Christophe