On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 09:53:40 -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439132
Add "bsd" to the list of format types to not checked during blkid
processing even though it supposedly knows the format - for some
(now unknown) reason it's returning partiion not found. So let's
s/partiion/partition/
Also it's not really a partition, it's a disklabel or partition table.
just let PARTED handle "bsd" too.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
Difference to v1: Just pull out and send separately.
src/storage/storage_util.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/storage/storage_util.c b/src/storage/storage_util.c
index 4ced81e..812429e 100644
--- a/src/storage/storage_util.c
+++ b/src/storage/storage_util.c
@@ -3034,10 +3034,12 @@ virStorageBackendBLKIDFindPart(blkid_probe probe,
/* A blkid_known_pttype on "dvh" and "pc98" returns a failure;
* however, the blkid_do_probe for "dvh" returns "sgi" and
- * for "pc98" it returns "dos". So since those will cause
problems
+ * for "pc98" it returns "dos". Although "bsd" is
recognized,
+ * it seems that the parted created partition table is not being
+ * properly recogized. Since each of these will cause problems
* with startup comparison, let's just treat them as UNKNOWN causing
* the caller to fallback to using PARTED */
- if (STREQ(format, "dvh") || STREQ(format, "pc98"))
+ if (STREQ(format, "dvh") || STREQ(format, "pc98") ||
STREQ(format, "bsd"))
return VIR_STORAGE_BLKID_PROBE_UNKNOWN;
/* Make sure we're doing a partitions probe from the start */
ACK