https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428209
Commit id 'bb74a7ffe' neglected to check that both the parent_wwnn
parent_wwpn are in the XML if one or the other is similar to how
the node device code checked (commit id '2b13361bc').
If only one is provided, the "default" is to use a vHBA capable
adapter (see commit id '78be2e8b'), so the vHBA could start, but
perhaps not on the expected adapter.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
src/conf/storage_conf.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/conf/storage_conf.c b/src/conf/storage_conf.c
index a52eeba..e4d89dd 100644
--- a/src/conf/storage_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/storage_conf.c
@@ -941,6 +941,17 @@ virStoragePoolDefParseXML(xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt)
if (!virValidateWWN(ret->source.adapter.data.fchost.wwnn) ||
!virValidateWWN(ret->source.adapter.data.fchost.wwpn))
goto error;
+
+ if ((ret->source.adapter.data.fchost.parent_wwnn &&
+ !ret->source.adapter.data.fchost.parent_wwpn) ||
+ (!ret->source.adapter.data.fchost.parent_wwnn &&
+ ret->source.adapter.data.fchost.parent_wwpn)) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
+ _("must supply both parent_wwnn and "
+ "parent_wwpn not just one or the other"));
+ goto error;
+ }
+
} else if (ret->source.adapter.type ==
VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_ADAPTER_TYPE_SCSI_HOST) {
if (!ret->source.adapter.data.scsi_host.name &&
--
2.9.3