Re: [libvirt] Resubmission #2: [PATCH 1/3] sVirt AppArmor security driver

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > [PATCH 1] > patch_1_reenable-nonfile-labels.patch (Updated based on prior feedback): > When James Morris originally submitted his sVirt patches (as seen in > libvirt 0.6.1), he did not require on disk labelling for > virSecurityDomainRestoreImageLabel. A later commit[2] changed this > behavior to assume on disk labelling, which halts implementations for > path-based MAC systems such as AppArmor and TOMOYO where > vm->def->seclabel is required to obtain the label. This patch simply > adds the 'virDomainObjPtr vm' argument back to *RestoreImageLabel.