On 04/27/2017 10:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:01:59AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
We prefer c89 style of comments.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> --- examples/openauth/openauth.c | 2 +- src/lxc/lxc_controller.c | 2 +- src/remote/remote_driver.c | 2 +- src/rpc/virnetservermdns.c | 2 +- src/security/security_stack.c | 8 ++++---- src/uml/uml_conf.c | 2 +- src/util/virhostcpu.c | 4 ++-- src/util/virhostmem.c | 4 ++-- src/vbox/vbox_snapshot_conf.c | 2 +- tests/eventtest.c | 2 +- tests/virhostcpumock.c | 2 +- 11 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
How about a syntax-check rule to enforce this ?
It's going to be not trivial. Consider: /* My awesome comment, that contains * http://an.url.com */ It's not easy to know that line 2 of the comment is already in comment. We can't just forbid all '//' strings. Michal